FIVA vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
FIVA and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FIVA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both FIVA and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIVA or ACWI.
Performance
FIVA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 18.91% return.
FIVA
4.76%
-3.12%
-2.53%
10.45%
5.83%
N/A
ACWI
18.91%
0.17%
9.04%
25.12%
11.29%
9.25%
Key characteristics
| FIVA | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 2.21 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 3.02 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.36 | 3.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.96 | 14.06 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.62% | 1.81% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.78% | 11.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.76% | -56.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.39% | -1.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIVA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and ACWI is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIVA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIVA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than ACWI's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% | 1.89% |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIVA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.11%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.