PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIUIX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Telecom and Utilities Fund (FIUIX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIUIX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than FBALX's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FIUIX has underperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.


FIUIX

1D
1.79%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
4.92%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
9.34%

FBALX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.04%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.50%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIUIX
Fidelity Telecom and Utilities Fund
4.92%4.91%30.29%3.37%5.00%7.18%2.08%22.09%3.33%11.98%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
10.30%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FIUIX and FBALX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1987

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FIUIX and FBALX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIUIX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIUIX
FIUIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FIUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FIUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Telecom and Utilities Fund (FIUIX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIUIXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.57

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.94

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

18.87

-18.19

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIUIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIUIX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIUIXFBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

2.97

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.79

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.92

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.81

-0.25

Drawdowns

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIUIX drawdown since its inception was -66.48%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIUIX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIUIXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.48%

-43.57%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-6.47%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-12.88%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-22.89%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

-26.68%

-6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.66%

0.00%

-7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-4.37%

-7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

1.35%

+3.92%

Volatility

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Telecom and Utilities Fund (FIUIX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 2.58%. This indicates that FIUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIUIXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

2.58%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

6.80%

+6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.44%

8.58%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

12.18%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

12.78%

+4.38%

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIUIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIUIX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FIUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than FBALX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.14%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
FIUIX
Fidelity Telecom and Utilities Fund
3.25%2.34%6.50%7.60%3.77%5.19%3.73%6.88%10.10%5.99%3.33%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIUIX and FBALX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIUIX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to FBALX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIUIX dropped -66.48% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIUIX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer