FIP vs. VRT

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a -15.80% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's -1.08% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VRT's 0.11% yield.

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and VRT.

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 20.92% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 12.17%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.