FIP vs. VRT
FIP (FTAI Infrastructure Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FIP in Conglomerates, VRT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 3 years, FIP returned 7.91%/yr vs 156.10%/yr for VRT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 104.63% return.
FIP
- 1D
- -5.80%
- 1M
- -19.86%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -28.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 104.63%
- 6M
- 85.33%
- 1Y
- 195.39%
- 3Y*
- 156.10%
- 5Y*
- 67.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FIP vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | -7.33% | -34.92% | 89.46% | 36.92% | 10.57% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 104.63% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | 16.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIP and VRT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
FIP:
$492.43M
VRT:
$129.97B
FIP:
-$3.39
VRT:
$3.99
FIP:
0.82
VRT:
11.95
FIP:
0.74
VRT:
30.62
FIP:
$594.72M
VRT:
$10.84B
FIP:
$54.17M
VRT:
$3.92B
FIP:
-$86.54M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIP vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
FIP
VRT
FIP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIP | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.47 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 7.94 | -8.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 22.67 | -23.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIP | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 3.42 | -3.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.04 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
FIP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIP | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -71.24% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.97% | -24.78% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.98% | -61.28% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -71.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.25% | -11.90% | -45.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.33% | -16.22% | -7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.54% | 8.66% | +17.88% |
Volatility
FIP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.92%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIP | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.01% | 16.92% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.41% | 44.82% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.09% | 57.51% | +11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.20% | 61.71% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.20% | 54.58% | +4.62% |
Dividends
FIP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than VRT's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | 2.84% | 2.60% | 1.65% | 3.08% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
FIP vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIP vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
FIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
FIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
FIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of -154.53M and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in a net margin of -82.0%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIP and VRT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIP has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to VRT (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIP dropped -67.98% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIP and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer