FIP vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

FIP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIP vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	7.78%	-34.92%	89.46%	36.92%	10.57%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	16.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FIP : $574.49M VRT : $98.15B
EPS FIP : -$1.26 VRT : $3.41
PS Ratio FIP : 1.14 VRT : 13.32
Total Revenue (TTM) FIP : $502.52M VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) FIP : $38.71M VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) FIP : $34.70M VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

FIP

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -14.41%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 11.72%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIP vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIP

FIP Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FIP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIP	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	3.97	-3.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	3.91	-3.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.52	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	9.60	-9.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	27.88	-27.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIP vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIP	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	3.97	-3.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.97	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between FIP and VRT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FIP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than VRT's 0.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	2.43%	2.60%	1.65%	3.08%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

FIP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIP	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.98%	-71.24%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.97%	-24.78%	-19.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.29%	-9.26%	-41.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-16.47%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.29%	8.53%	+15.76%

Volatility

FIP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 22.00% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 20.14%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIP	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.00%	20.14%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.72%	45.36%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.46%	62.91%	+11.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.14%	61.08%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	54.59%	+4.55%

Financials