FIP vs. VRT
Compare and contrast key facts about FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FIP or VRT.
Key characteristics
| FIP | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 126.30% | 159.51% |
| 1Y Return | 144.53% | 186.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.26 | 3.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.48 | 3.47 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 7.48 | 5.32 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.07 | 15.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.41% | 12.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 49.29% | 53.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.91% | -71.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.34% | -1.79% |
Fundamentals
| FIP | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.05B | $47.59B |
| EPS | -$1.98 | $1.46 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $332.17M | $7.53B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $76.49M | $2.75B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$14.42M | $1.49B |
Correlation
The correlation between FIP and VRT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FIP vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 126.30% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 159.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FIP vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FIP vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than VRT's 0.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | 1.38% | 3.08% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.08% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
FIP vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FIP vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 14.72% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 12.39%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FIP vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities