FIP vs. DRS
FIP (FTAI Infrastructure Inc.) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FIP in Conglomerates, DRS in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, FIP returned 4.53%/yr vs 41.59%/yr for DRS. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FIP vs. DRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a -18.09% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 35.63% return.
FIP
- 1D
- -6.75%
- 1M
- -15.99%
- 6M
- -35.12%
- YTD
- -18.09%
- 1Y
- -39.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.49%
DRS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.28M | $45.66M | $45.85M | |
| $4.34M | $3.78M | $4.61M |
FIP vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | -18.09% | -34.92% | 89.46% | 36.92% | 4.24% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 35.63% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIP and DRS is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
FIP:
$440.75M
DRS:
$12.28B
FIP:
-$3.38
DRS:
$1.60
FIP:
0.73
DRS:
2.46
FIP:
$594.72M
DRS:
$3.78B
FIP:
$54.17M
DRS:
$934.00M
FIP:
-$86.54M
DRS:
$384.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIP vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank
FIP
DRS
FIP vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIP | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 0.42 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 0.91 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIP vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and DRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIP | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -32.48% | -35.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.74% | -28.16% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.98% | -32.48% | -35.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.22% | -7.33% | -54.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -7.32% | -18.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.22% | 12.79% | +17.43% |
Volatility
FIP vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 10.67%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIP | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.32% | 10.67% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.08% | 32.61% | +16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.30% | 39.96% | +32.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.91% | 38.75% | +22.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.91% | 38.75% | +22.16% |
Dividends
FIP vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison
FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DRS's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc. | 3.22% | 2.60% | 1.65% | 3.08% | 1.02% |
Financials
FIP vs. DRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIP vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison
FIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 242.00M and revenue of 913.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.
FIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 102.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
FIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of -154.53M and revenue of 188.36M, resulting in a net margin of -82.0%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 86.00M and revenue of 913.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIP and DRS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIP has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to DRS (10.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIP dropped -67.98% vs DRS's -32.48%.
DRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIP and DRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer