FIP vs. DRS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS).

Performance

FIP vs. DRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIP vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	7.78%	-34.92%	89.46%	36.92%	3.87%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	30.84%	6.56%	61.23%	56.81%	16.29%

Fundamentals

EPS FIP : -$1.26 DRS : $1.55
PS Ratio FIP : 1.14 DRS : 2.19
Total Revenue (TTM) FIP : $502.52M DRS : $3.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) FIP : $38.71M DRS : $869.00M
EBITDA (TTM) FIP : $34.70M DRS : $208.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 7.78% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 30.84% return.

FIP

• 1D: 4.88%
• 1M: -14.41%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 11.72%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRS

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: -1.49%
• 1Y: 36.62%
• 3Y*: 51.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIP vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIP

FIP Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FIP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FIP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

DRS

DRS Risk / Return Rank: 67
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIP vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIP	DRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	0.89	-0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.45	-0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.19	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	1.13	-0.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	2.38	-2.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIP vs. DRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and DRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIP	DRS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	0.89	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	1.38	-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between FIP and DRS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FIP vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than DRS's 0.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIP FTAI Infrastructure Inc.	2.43%	2.60%	1.65%	3.08%	1.02%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	0.81%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FIP vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and DRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIP	DRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.98%	-32.48%	-35.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.97%	-32.48%	-11.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.29%	-7.47%	-42.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.12%	-7.16%	-14.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.29%	15.49%	+8.80%

Volatility

FIP vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) has a higher volatility of 22.00% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 10.86%. This indicates that FIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIP	DRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.00%	10.86%	+11.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.72%	30.52%	+18.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.46%	41.37%	+33.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.14%	38.53%	+20.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.14%	38.53%	+20.61%

Financials

FIP vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 269.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

FIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 143.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 126.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

FIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FTAI Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of -125.48M and revenue of 143.52M, resulting in a net margin of -87.4%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.