FIP vs. DRS

In the year-to-date period, FIP achieves a 85.84% return, which is significantly higher than DRS's 63.77% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIP and DRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while DRS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FIP drawdown since its inception was -34.91%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIP and DRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) is 13.25%, while Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that FIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FTAI Infrastructure Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.