FILL vs. XLE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE).
FILL and XLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both FILL and XLE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FILL or XLE.
Key characteristics
| FILL | XLE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.00% | 12.07% |
| 1Y Return | 21.24% | 20.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.22% | 25.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.84% | 13.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.46% | 3.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 1.09 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.74% | 18.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.98% | -71.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.08% | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FILL and XLE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FILL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FILL having a 12.00% return and XLE slightly higher at 12.07%. Over the past 10 years, FILL has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 3.46%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FILL vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FILL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FILL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FILL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than XLE's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILL iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 3.71% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% | 2.44% | 2.46% |
XLE Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.13% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 5.73% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% | 2.35% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
FILL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FILL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILL and XLE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FILL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.