FILL vs. WENS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L).
FILL and WENS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. WENS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2019. Both FILL and WENS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FILL or WENS.L.
Key characteristics
| FILL | WENS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.29% | 9.96% |
| 1Y Return | 21.62% | 17.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.46 | 1.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.77% | 17.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.98% | -20.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.83% | -6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FILL and WENS.L is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FILL vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FILL achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than WENS.L's 9.96% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FILL vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FILL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FILL vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FILL vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison
FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than WENS.L's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILL iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 3.70% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% | 2.44% | 2.46% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.28% | 3.61% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FILL vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FILL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -20.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILL and WENS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FILL vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is 4.43%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that FILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.