PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FILL vs. VPU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FILLVPU
YTD Return4.57%28.19%
1Y Return5.64%36.56%
3Y Return (Ann)14.96%8.96%
5Y Return (Ann)10.01%7.83%
10Y Return (Ann)4.14%9.28%
Sharpe Ratio0.382.36
Sortino Ratio0.623.26
Omega Ratio1.071.41
Calmar Ratio0.471.77
Martin Ratio1.1111.98
Ulcer Index5.60%3.10%
Daily Std Dev16.19%15.82%
Max Drawdown-65.98%-46.31%
Current Drawdown-9.51%-3.11%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FILL and VPU is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FILL vs. VPU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FILL achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than VPU's 28.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FILL has underperformed VPU with an annualized return of 4.14%, while VPU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.22%
12.46%
FILL
VPU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FILL vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VPU's 0.10% expense ratio.


FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
Expense ratio chart for FILL: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for VPU: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FILL vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FILL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FILL, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.38
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FILL, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FILL, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FILL, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FILL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.11
VPU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VPU, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VPU, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VPU, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VPU, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VPU, currently valued at 11.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.76

FILL vs. VPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILL Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the VPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILL and VPU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.38
2.32
FILL
VPU

Dividends

FILL vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison

FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than VPU's 2.89% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
4.08%4.16%4.82%3.93%3.97%5.71%3.17%3.10%2.75%3.41%2.43%2.46%
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
2.89%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%3.02%3.76%

Drawdowns

FILL vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than VPU's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILL and VPU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.51%
-3.11%
FILL
VPU

Volatility

FILL vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) is 4.65%, while Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that FILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.65%
5.26%
FILL
VPU