FILL vs. IXC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC).
FILL and IXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FILL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. IXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2001. Both FILL and IXC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FILL or IXC.
Key characteristics
| FILL | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.04% | 9.64% |
| 1Y Return | 23.34% | 21.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 23.81% | 24.12% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.19% | 10.45% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.37% | 3.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.35 | 1.21 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.90% | 17.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.98% | -67.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.91% | -4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FILL and IXC is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FILL vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FILL achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FILL has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 3.37%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FILL vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FILL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FILL vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FILL vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
FILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than IXC's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FILL iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF | 3.75% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% | 2.44% | 2.46% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.15% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% | 3.02% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
FILL vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FILL drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILL and IXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FILL vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) have volatilities of 4.30% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.