FIHBX vs. JNK
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK).
FIHBX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Nov 1, 2002. JNK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2007.
Performance
FIHBX vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIHBX vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund | -1.32% | 8.59% | 6.40% | 13.17% | -12.64% | 3.92% | 5.99% | 15.01% | -2.80% | 7.19% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | -0.14% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than JNK's -0.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIHBX having a 5.15% annualized return and JNK not far ahead at 5.25%.
FIHBX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
JNK
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIHBX vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIHBX vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
FIHBX
JNK
FIHBX vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIHBX | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.29 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.92 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.82 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 9.34 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIHBX | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.29 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.63 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.42 | +0.93 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIHBX and JNK is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FIHBX vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than JNK's 6.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund | 6.00% | 6.29% | 5.94% | 5.93% | 4.58% | 4.25% | 5.14% | 5.79% | 6.24% | 5.55% | 5.75% | 6.46% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.67% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Drawdowns
FIHBX vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum JNK drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and JNK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIHBX | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -38.48% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -4.17% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.35% | -16.67% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.67% | -22.89% | +1.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.13% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -3.73% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.81% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FIHBX vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) is 1.50%, while SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that FIHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIHBX | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 2.27% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 2.95% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 5.72% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 7.53% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 8.34% | -2.58% |