PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGFX vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIGFX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGFX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 8.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIGFX having a 9.27% annualized return and EFA not far behind at 9.11%.


FIGFX

1D
1.25%
1M
3.18%
YTD
7.22%
6M
8.42%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
9.27%

EFA

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.42%
6M
10.94%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGFX vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIGFX
Fidelity International Growth Fund
7.22%17.91%4.90%20.89%-23.19%15.42%16.95%33.97%-11.52%28.83%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
8.42%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGFX and EFA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2007

0.93

The correlation between FIGFX and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGFX vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGFX
FIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGFX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIGFXEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.85

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

6.94

-3.14

FIGFX vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGFX and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGFXEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.41

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.31

0.00

Drawdowns

FIGFX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGFX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGFX and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGFXEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-61.04%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-11.42%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-14.05%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.91%

-29.53%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.91%

-34.19%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-1.46%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-11.93%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.04%

+0.73%

Volatility

FIGFX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 4.98%. This indicates that FIGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGFXEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

4.98%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

12.51%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

15.05%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.48%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.26%

+0.57%

FIGFX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIGFX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

FIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than EFA's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.12%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
FIGFX
Fidelity International Growth Fund
3.21%3.44%0.78%0.48%1.66%1.93%0.11%0.97%0.88%0.12%1.24%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIGFX and EFA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIGFX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to EFA (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGFX dropped -55.97% vs EFA's -61.04%.

EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGFX and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer