FIFNX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIFNX (Fidelity Founders Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIFNX returned 13.30%/yr vs 17.08%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIFNX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Founders Fund (FIFNX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIFNX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return.

FIFNX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 6.76%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.88%
• 3Y*: 25.47%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FIFNX Fidelity Founders Fund	9.17%	16.34%	36.44%	33.95%	-26.69%	19.00%	47.20%	13.95%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	18.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FIFNX and FBGRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019	0.94

The correlation between FIFNX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIFNX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIFNX

FIFNX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FIFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FIFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FIFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FIFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FIFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Founders Fund (FIFNX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIFNX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.67	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	3.41	-1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.45	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	3.67	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	15.56	-7.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIFNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIFNX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIFNX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.67	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.69	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.68	+0.13

Drawdowns

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIFNX drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIFNX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIFNX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.52%	-58.64%	+26.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-12.65%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.26%	-27.07%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.52%	-43.08%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	0.00%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-12.53%	+4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.98%	+0.03%

Volatility

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Founders Fund (FIFNX) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that FIFNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIFNX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	4.14%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	13.00%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	17.44%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.18%	24.88%	-3.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.58%	23.69%	-1.11%

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIFNX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIFNX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FIFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FIFNX Fidelity Founders Fund	2.20%	2.40%	6.31%	0.11%	2.54%	6.17%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIFNX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FIFNX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIFNX or FBGRX?

FIFNX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIFNX dropped -32.52% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.