FIDZX vs. FICS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FIDZX (Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z) and FICS (First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF) are both funds - FIDZX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FICS is a Global Equities fund tracking the The International Developed Capital Strength Index. Over the past 5 years, FIDZX returned 5.63%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for FICS. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIDZX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FICS.

Performance

FIDZX vs. FICS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDZX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than FICS's 7.44% return.

FIDZX

• 1D: 4.48%
• 1M: -3.67%
• 6M: 0.29%
• YTD: 4.95%
• 1Y: 7.76%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 5.63%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

FICS

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 6.50%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 1Y: 13.61%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF	$473.06K	$451.89K	$904.09K
FIDZX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIDZX vs. FICS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FIDZX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	4.95%	18.83%	8.15%	27.79%	-26.45%	12.40%	3.33%
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF	7.44%	20.44%	2.59%	18.07%	-19.47%	19.78%	2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDZX and FICS is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020	0.77

The correlation between FIDZX and FICS shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDZX vs. FICS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIDZX	FICS
Industrials	31.0%	27.7%
Technology	29.5%	1.7%
Financial Services	21.4%	29.0%
Basic Materials	7.8%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	13.8%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Energy	1.5%	3.1%
Healthcare	1.5%	9.6%
Communication Services	1.2%	3.6%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FIDZX vs. FICS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIDZX

FIDZX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FIDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FIDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FIDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FIDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FIDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FICS

FICS Risk / Return Rank: 41
FICS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FICS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FICS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FICS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FICS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIDZX vs. FICS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIDZX	FICS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	1.04	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	1.58	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.19	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	1.33	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	4.41	-3.05

FIDZX vs. FICS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the FICS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDZX and FICS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIDZX vs. FICS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDZX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, which is greater than FICS's maximum drawdown of -29.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDZX and FICS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDZX	FICS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.17%	-29.16%	-8.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.44%	-10.32%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.24%	-11.14%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.17%	-29.16%	-8.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.30%	-0.65%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-7.04%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	3.10%	+1.24%

Volatility

FIDZX vs. FICS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) at 3.87%. This indicates that FIDZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FICS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDZX	FICS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.74%	3.87%	+4.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.27%	11.30%	+7.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.97%	13.21%	+7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.56%	17.25%	+2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	16.81%	+1.84%

FIDZX vs. FICS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FICS's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIDZX vs. FICS - Dividend Comparison

FIDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than FICS's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF	1.81%	1.85%	2.01%	1.02%	1.89%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIDZX Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z	5.31%	5.57%	0.84%	0.46%	0.00%	3.90%	0.19%	0.63%	0.67%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDZX and FICS in my portfolio?

FIDZX and FICS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDZX or FICS?

FIDZX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to FICS (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDZX dropped -37.17% vs FICS's -29.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FICS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.