PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDZX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDZX achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 20.71% return.


FIDZX

1D
2.50%
1M
7.95%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.85%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*

BUFIX

1D
2.85%
1M
6.85%
YTD
20.71%
6M
21.78%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDZX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
14.00%18.83%8.15%27.79%-26.45%12.40%22.36%32.97%-12.72%28.67%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
20.71%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%23.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDZX and BUFIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FIDZX and BUFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDZX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDZX
FIDZX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FIDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDZXBUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.93

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

6.69

-1.75

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDZX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDZX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDZX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDZXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-55.09%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-12.85%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-15.52%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-34.93%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-9.15%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

3.71%

+0.13%

Volatility

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) have volatilities of 8.63% and 9.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDZXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

9.02%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

16.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

18.81%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

17.91%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

17.67%

+0.79%

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

FIDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than BUFIX's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.70%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
FIDZX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
4.88%5.57%0.84%0.46%0.00%3.90%0.19%0.63%0.67%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FIDZX and BUFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BUFIX has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to FIDZX (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDZX dropped -37.17% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

BUFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDZX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer