PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDZX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDZX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 15.10% return.


FIDZX

1D
4.48%
1M
-3.67%
6M
0.29%
YTD
4.95%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.64%

BUFIX

1D
3.23%
1M
-2.38%
6M
9.56%
YTD
15.10%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDZX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
4.95%18.83%8.15%27.79%-26.45%12.40%22.36%32.97%-12.72%28.67%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
15.10%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%23.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDZX and BUFIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FIDZX and BUFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDZX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIDZX
FIDZX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FIDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDZXBUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.18

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.43

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

4.81

-3.45

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDZX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDZX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDZX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDZXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.17%

-55.09%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-12.85%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-15.52%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-34.93%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-5.04%

-3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-9.12%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.83%

+0.51%

Volatility

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (FIDZX) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) at 6.64%. This indicates that FIDZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDZXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.74%

6.64%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

18.16%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

20.17%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

18.20%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

17.62%

+1.03%

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDZX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDZX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

FIDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than BUFIX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.74%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
FIDZX
Fidelity Advisor International Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z
5.31%5.57%0.84%0.46%0.00%3.90%0.19%0.63%0.67%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FIDZX and BUFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDZX has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to BUFIX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDZX dropped -37.17% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

BUFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDZX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer