PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDU vs. IYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDU vs. IYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDU achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than IYT's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDU has outperformed IYT with an annualized return of 14.31%, while IYT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.


FIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.53%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
14.31%

IYT

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.67%
YTD
12.55%
6M
11.63%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDU vs. IYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
14.93%18.61%16.51%22.62%-8.36%20.96%13.72%30.69%-13.85%22.22%
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
12.55%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%20.11%-12.87%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDU and IYT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.85

The correlation between FIDU and IYT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIDU vs. IYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIDU
IYT

Industrials

92.1%
83.3%

Technology

6.4%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

FIDU
92.1%
IYT
83.3%

Technology

FIDU
6.4%
IYT
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FIDU
1.0%
IYT

-

Basic Materials

FIDU
0.2%
IYT

-

Financial Services

FIDU
0.2%
IYT

-

Utilities

FIDU
0.1%
IYT

-

Communication Services

FIDU
0.0%
IYT

-

Energy

FIDU
0.0%
IYT

-

Healthcare

FIDU
0.0%
IYT

-

Consumer Defensive

FIDU

-

IYT

-

Real Estate

FIDU

-

IYT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDU vs. IYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDU
FIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDU vs. IYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDUIYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.42

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

7.80

+1.29

FIDU vs. IYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the IYT Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDU and IYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDUIYTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.45

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.25

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.45

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.42

+0.24

Drawdowns

FIDU vs. IYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDU drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum IYT drawdown of -60.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDU and IYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDUIYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.31%

-60.39%

+18.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-12.09%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-26.35%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-29.15%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.31%

-41.28%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.50%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-9.32%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.74%

-0.78%

Volatility

FIDU vs. IYT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) is 5.27%, while iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that FIDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDUIYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.92%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

15.44%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

20.17%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

22.29%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

23.14%

-2.83%

FIDU vs. IYT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYT's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDU vs. IYT - Dividend Comparison

FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than IYT's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDU
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.02%1.42%1.42%1.48%1.12%1.28%1.73%1.99%1.60%1.63%1.98%
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.96%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDU and IYT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYT has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FIDU (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDU dropped -42.31% vs IYT's -60.39%.

On 10-year performance, FIDU leads with 14.31% vs 10.45% for IYT. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FIDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYT.

FIDU and IYT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.95%.

FIDU is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IYT is Transportation Equities. FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index, while IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FIDU and 0.42% for IYT.

FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDU and IYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer