FIDKX vs. ES

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K (FIDKX) and Eversource Energy (ES).

FIDKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.

Performance

FIDKX vs. ES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K (FIDKX) and Eversource Energy (ES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIDKX vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDKX Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K	-5.15%	27.70%	11.03%	14.30%	-24.73%	11.18%	21.55%	27.66%	-17.06%	30.27%
ES Eversource Energy	3.98%	22.86%	-2.46%	-23.43%	-5.06%	8.18%	4.45%	34.49%	6.41%	17.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDKX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDKX has outperformed ES with an annualized return of 7.89%, while ES has yielded a comparatively lower 5.22% annualized return.

FIDKX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -12.29%
• YTD: -5.15%
• 6M: -3.26%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 12.65%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

ES

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -8.13%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: -0.48%
• 1Y: 16.71%
• 3Y*: 0.43%
• 5Y*: -0.54%
• 10Y*: 5.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIDKX vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDKX

FIDKX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FIDKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
FIDKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FIDKX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FIDKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FIDKX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

ES

ES Risk / Return Rank: 63
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDKX vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K (FIDKX) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDKX	ES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.63	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	0.94	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.14	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	1.23	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	3.33	+0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDKX vs. ES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the ES Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDKX and ES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDKX	ES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	0.63	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	-0.02	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.22	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.28	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between FIDKX and ES is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FIDKX vs. ES - Dividend Comparison

FIDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than ES's 4.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDKX Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K	7.38%	7.00%	3.01%	2.02%	0.47%	11.39%	3.78%	2.43%	4.00%	4.02%	1.96%	0.01%
ES Eversource Energy	4.40%	4.47%	4.98%	4.37%	3.04%	2.65%	2.62%	2.52%	3.11%	3.01%	3.22%	3.27%

Drawdowns

FIDKX vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDKX drawdown since its inception was -56.79%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDKX and ES.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDKX	ES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.79%	-73.04%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.08%	-15.13%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.47%	-41.69%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	-41.69%	+5.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.06%	-13.60%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.56%	-19.09%	+5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	5.59%	-2.14%

Volatility

FIDKX vs. ES - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Discovery Fund Class K (FIDKX) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Eversource Energy (ES) at 7.20%. This indicates that FIDKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDKX	ES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.28%	7.20%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	19.74%	-6.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	26.49%	-7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	23.77%	-7.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	24.24%	-7.42%