PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FID vs. BFIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FID vs. BFIT

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT).

FID and BFIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FID is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2013. BFIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Health & Wellness Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016. Both FID and BFIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FID or BFIT.

Correlation

The correlation between FID and BFIT is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

FID vs. BFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

FID

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BFIT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FID vs. BFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BFIT's 0.50% expense ratio.

FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
BFIT
Global X Health & Wellness ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FID vs. BFIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FID
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FID is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FID is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FID is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FID is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FID is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FID is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
BFIT
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FID vs. BFIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Global X Health & Wellness ETF (BFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

FID vs. BFIT - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while BFIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF		3.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BFIT
Global X Health & Wellness ETF		0.00%0.00%1.56%0.93%0.65%0.52%0.57%0.49%0.87%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FID vs. BFIT - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

FID vs. BFIT - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...