PortfoliosLab logo
FICO vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FICO and CDNS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

FICO vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50,000.00%100,000.00%150,000.00%200,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
136,529.12%
15,331.71%
FICO
CDNS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FICO:

1.04

CDNS:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

FICO:

1.50

CDNS:

-0.77

Omega Ratio

FICO:

1.20

CDNS:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

FICO:

1.15

CDNS:

-0.87

Martin Ratio

FICO:

2.80

CDNS:

-1.78

Ulcer Index

FICO:

12.17%

CDNS:

14.03%

Daily Std Dev

FICO:

32.63%

CDNS:

37.83%

Max Drawdown

FICO:

-79.26%

CDNS:

-93.13%

Current Drawdown

FICO:

-29.74%

CDNS:

-28.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FICO:

$40.92B

CDNS:

$63.88B

EPS

FICO:

$21.79

CDNS:

$3.86

PE Ratio

FICO:

76.82

CDNS:

60.33

PEG Ratio

FICO:

1.77

CDNS:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

FICO:

$1.34B

CDNS:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FICO:

$1.08B

CDNS:

$3.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

FICO:

$581.26M

CDNS:

$1.28B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -15.92% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -22.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 33.81%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 28.78% annualized return.


FICO

YTD

-15.92%

1M

-10.63%

6M

-12.51%

1Y

37.23%

5Y*

44.83%

10Y*

33.81%

CDNS

YTD

-22.49%

1M

-4.83%

6M

-13.31%

1Y

-24.01%

5Y*

29.58%

10Y*

28.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FICO vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FICO is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FICO is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FICO is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FICO is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FICO is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FICO is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FICO vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FICO, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
FICO: 1.04
CDNS: -0.66
The chart of Sortino ratio for FICO, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
FICO: 1.50
CDNS: -0.77
The chart of Omega ratio for FICO, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FICO: 1.20
CDNS: 0.90
The chart of Calmar ratio for FICO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
FICO: 1.15
CDNS: -0.87
The chart of Martin ratio for FICO, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
FICO: 2.80
CDNS: -1.78

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.04
-0.66
FICO
CDNS

Dividends

FICO vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FICO nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%0.11%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FICO vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-29.74%
-28.67%
FICO
CDNS

Volatility

FICO vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.57% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 12.42%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.57%
12.42%
FICO
CDNS

Financials

FICO vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items