FICO vs. CDNS

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FICO has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 38.98%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 32.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FICO nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 6.90%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.