FIAFX vs. WMT
FIAFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class I) is Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FIAFX returned 4.42%/yr vs 19.22%/yr for WMT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FIAFX vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIAFX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FIAFX has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 4.42%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.22% annualized return.
FIAFX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.69%
- 5Y*
- 22.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
FIAFX vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class I | 4.85% | 10.07% | 4.29% | 8.05% | -11.40% | 3.13% | 8.79% | 11.10% | -1.80% | 7.30% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 5.60% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIAFX and WMT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003 | 0.30 |
The correlation between FIAFX and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIAFX vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
FIAFX
WMT
FIAFX vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class I (FIAFX) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIAFX | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.19 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.46 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | 4.42 | +7.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIAFX vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIAFX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAFX and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIAFX | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -77.14% | +58.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.78% | -15.75% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.88% | -21.93% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.92% | -25.74% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.92% | -25.74% | +9.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.68% | +12.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -14.63% | +12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 5.20% | -4.32% |
Volatility
FIAFX vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class I (FIAFX) is 2.29%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that FIAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIAFX | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 9.54% | -7.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.32% | 18.48% | -14.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.94% | 23.80% | -18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 21.69% | -16.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 21.75% | -17.06% |
Dividends
FIAFX vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
FIAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than WMT's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class I | 2.93% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 2.88% | 5.95% | 5.27% | 3.82% | 3.77% | 5.61% | 3.31% | 3.09% | 3.04% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.82% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIAFX and WMT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to FIAFX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAFX dropped -18.94% vs WMT's -77.14%.
FIAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIAFX and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer