FHLC vs. RXL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) are both exchange-traded funds - FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while RXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FHLC returned 9.14%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for RXL. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHLC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RXL.

Performance

FHLC vs. RXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly higher than RXL's -11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has underperformed RXL with an annualized return of 9.14%, while RXL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.

FHLC

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: -3.90%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: 14.43%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 9.14%

RXL

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: -11.43%
• 6M: -11.48%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 3.42%
• 5Y*: 1.84%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLC vs. RXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	-3.90%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	-11.43%	19.76%	-2.72%	-3.15%	-15.26%	48.06%	19.24%	40.40%	3.38%	46.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and RXL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.98

The correlation between FHLC and RXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

FHLC vs. RXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FHLC	RXL
Healthcare	99.6%	78.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	12.0%
Technology	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FHLC vs. RXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

RXL

RXL Risk / Return Rank: 19
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLC vs. RXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLC	RXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.59	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.07	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.12	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	0.82	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	1.93	+1.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLC vs. RXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the RXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLC and RXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLC	RXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.59	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.06	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.34	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.40	+0.21

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. RXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum RXL drawdown of -67.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and RXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLC	RXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-67.70%	+38.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-21.33%	+10.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-36.08%	+19.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	-36.08%	+18.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.76%	-51.00%	+22.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-19.51%	+12.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-15.86%	+10.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	9.02%	-4.91%

Volatility

FHLC vs. RXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 4.05%, while ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLC	RXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	8.46%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	20.63%	-10.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.33%	29.52%	-15.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	29.60%	-14.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	33.23%	-16.42%

FHLC vs. RXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RXL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHLC vs. RXL - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than RXL's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.43%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care	1.64%	1.43%	1.22%	0.18%	0.32%	0.10%	0.15%	0.27%	0.32%	0.11%	0.12%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLC and RXL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FHLC and RXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHLC or RXL?

RXL has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to FHLC (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLC dropped -28.76% vs RXL's -67.70%.

Which ETF is better, FHLC or RXL?

On 10-year performance, RXL leads with 11.41% vs 9.14% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FHLC or RXL?

Over the 10-year period, RXL has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FHLC or RXL?

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FHLC or RXL?

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.43% for FHLC.

What is the main difference between FHLC and RXL?

FHLC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RXL is Leveraged Equities. FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FHLC and 0.95% for RXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.