FHLC vs. QTUM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM).
FHLC and QTUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. QTUM is a passively managed fund by Defiance ETFs that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2018. Both FHLC and QTUM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FHLC or QTUM.
Correlation
The correlation between FHLC and QTUM is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FHLC vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FHLC:
0.38
QTUM:
2.38
FHLC:
0.59
QTUM:
3.18
FHLC:
1.07
QTUM:
1.40
FHLC:
0.36
QTUM:
3.40
FHLC:
1.26
QTUM:
10.43
FHLC:
3.41%
QTUM:
5.60%
FHLC:
11.40%
QTUM:
24.56%
FHLC:
-28.76%
QTUM:
-38.45%
FHLC:
-11.80%
QTUM:
-2.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 55.65% return.
FHLC
1.92%
-3.03%
-4.03%
3.32%
7.01%
8.42%
QTUM
55.65%
30.42%
31.27%
57.65%
24.50%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHLC vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FHLC vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FHLC vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QTUM's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 2.14% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% | 1.03% | 0.20% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.60% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.45% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FHLC vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and QTUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FHLC vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 3.53%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.