FHB vs. BANF
FHB (First Hawaiian, Inc.) and BANF (BancFirst Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, FHB returned 3.37%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for BANF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FHB vs. BANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHB achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than BANF's 4.20% return.
FHB
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BANF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- -8.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
FHB vs. BANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHB First Hawaiian, Inc. | 8.91% | 1.64% | 18.72% | -7.56% | -0.92% | 20.39% | -13.84% | 33.26% | -20.12% | -13.60% |
BANF BancFirst Corporation | 4.20% | -8.04% | 22.62% | 12.44% | 27.10% | 22.79% | -2.90% | 27.93% | -0.62% | 11.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHB and BANF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FHB and BANF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FHB:
$2.29
BANF:
$7.11
FHB:
11.81
BANF:
15.47
FHB:
4.71
BANF:
1.70
FHB:
3.07
BANF:
4.52
FHB:
$1.10B
BANF:
$824.33M
FHB:
$635.99M
BANF:
$683.43M
FHB:
$294.52M
BANF:
$325.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHB vs. BANF — Risk / Return Rank
FHB
BANF
FHB vs. BANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | -0.31 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | -0.26 | +1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.97 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | -0.41 | +1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | -0.66 | +3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | -0.31 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.39 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
FHB vs. BANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHB drawdown since its inception was -55.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BANF drawdown of -57.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHB and BANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.51% | -57.10% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.65% | -23.63% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.26% | -23.63% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.02% | -37.97% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -18.37% | +16.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -13.95% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 14.58% | -8.80% |
Volatility
FHB vs. BANF - Volatility Comparison
First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF) have volatilities of 5.83% and 6.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 6.03% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.16% | 18.90% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 26.94% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 30.25% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.52% | 35.73% | -3.21% |
Dividends
FHB vs. BANF - Dividend Comparison
FHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than BANF's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANF BancFirst Corporation | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 1.99% | 2.04% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 2.39% |
FHB First Hawaiian, Inc. | 3.85% | 4.11% | 4.01% | 4.55% | 3.99% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 3.60% | 4.26% | 3.02% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Financials
FHB vs. BANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Hawaiian, Inc. and BancFirst Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FHB vs. BANF - Profitability Comparison
FHB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 229.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.00M and revenue of 181.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
FHB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 229.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported an operating income of 73.61M and revenue of 181.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.
FHB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported a net income of 67.78M and revenue of 229.70M, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.
BANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a net income of 59.50M and revenue of 181.00M, resulting in a net margin of 32.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FHB and BANF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BANF has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FHB (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHB dropped -55.51% vs BANF's -57.10%.
FHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHB and BANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer