FHB vs. BANF
FHB (First Hawaiian, Inc.) and BANF (BancFirst Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, FHB returned 4.61%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for BANF. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FHB vs. BANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHB achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than BANF's 7.33% return.
FHB
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.52%
BANF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- -6.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.62M | $16.66M | $19.54M | |
| $73.18M | $83.50M | $58.84M |
FHB vs. BANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHB First Hawaiian, Inc. | 12.05% | 1.64% | 18.72% | -7.56% | -0.92% | 20.39% | -13.84% | 33.26% | -20.12% | -13.60% |
BANF BancFirst Corporation | 7.33% | -8.04% | 22.62% | 12.44% | 27.10% | 22.79% | -2.90% | 27.93% | -0.62% | 11.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHB and BANF is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FHB and BANF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FHB:
$3.38B
BANF:
$3.79B
FHB:
$2.30
BANF:
$7.42
FHB:
12.08
BANF:
15.21
FHB:
4.81
BANF:
1.68
FHB:
3.52
BANF:
8.30
FHB:
1.21
BANF:
0.62
FHB:
$976.30M
BANF:
$461.82M
FHB:
$690.08M
BANF:
$352.26M
FHB:
$205.39M
BANF:
$263.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHB vs. BANF — Risk / Return Rank
FHB
BANF
FHB vs. BANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) and BancFirst Corporation (BANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.33 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | -0.50 | +4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHB vs. BANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHB drawdown since its inception was -55.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BANF drawdown of -57.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHB and BANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.51% | -57.10% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.65% | -23.63% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.26% | -23.63% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.02% | -37.97% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.51% | -57.10% | +1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.40% | -15.92% | +7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -13.96% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 15.66% | -10.18% |
Volatility
FHB vs. BANF - Volatility Comparison
First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to BancFirst Corporation (BANF) at 6.04%. This indicates that FHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHB | BANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 6.04% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 17.72% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.25% | 26.72% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.54% | 30.12% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 35.61% | -3.21% |
Dividends
FHB vs. BANF - Dividend Comparison
FHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than BANF's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANF BancFirst Corporation | 1.70% | 1.79% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 1.99% | 2.04% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 2.39% |
FHB First Hawaiian, Inc. | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.01% | 4.55% | 3.99% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 3.60% | 4.26% | 3.02% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Financials
FHB vs. BANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Hawaiian, Inc. and BancFirst Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FHB and BANF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHB has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to BANF (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHB dropped -55.51% vs BANF's -57.10%.
FHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHB and BANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer