FGT.L vs. IIPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FGT.L or IIPR.
Key characteristics
| FGT.L | IIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.34% | 8.32% |
| 1Y Return | 8.01% | 49.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.32% | -23.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.49% | 10.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.71 | 1.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.10 | 2.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.76 | 8.04 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.20% | 5.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.56% | 31.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.70% | -75.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.44% | -55.38% |
Fundamentals
| FGT.L | IIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £1.39B | $2.95B |
| EPS | £0.04 | $5.69 |
| PE Ratio | 214.25 | 18.27 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | £96.62M | $310.93M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £91.89M | $231.15M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -£1.29M | $243.41M |
Correlation
The correlation between FGT.L and IIPR is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FGT.L achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than IIPR's 8.32% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Dividend Comparison
FGT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than IIPR's 7.16% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGT.L Finsbury Growth & Income Trust | 2.29% | 2.22% | 2.15% | 1.86% | 1.90% | 1.84% | 2.03% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 1.13% | 0.02% | 2.03% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 7.16% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 2.64% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGT.L drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum IIPR drawdown of -75.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGT.L and IIPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) is 5.21%, while Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that FGT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FGT.L vs. IIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finsbury Growth & Income Trust and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities