PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGT.L vs. HMWO.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FGT.LHMWO.L
YTD Return0.91%20.39%
1Y Return6.76%26.50%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.15%9.09%
5Y Return (Ann)1.21%12.82%
10Y Return (Ann)7.02%12.47%
Sharpe Ratio0.532.54
Sortino Ratio0.853.56
Omega Ratio1.101.49
Calmar Ratio0.534.04
Martin Ratio2.8318.32
Ulcer Index2.20%1.40%
Daily Std Dev11.65%10.06%
Max Drawdown-53.70%-25.48%
Current Drawdown-4.80%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between FGT.L and HMWO.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FGT.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than HMWO.L's 20.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FGT.L has underperformed HMWO.L with an annualized return of 7.02%, while HMWO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.15%
8.90%
FGT.L
HMWO.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.91
HMWO.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 3.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HMWO.L, currently valued at 16.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.54

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the HMWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGT.L and HMWO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
2.63
FGT.L
HMWO.L

Dividends

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Dividend Comparison

FGT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than HMWO.L's 1.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FGT.L
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust
2.32%2.22%2.15%1.86%1.90%1.84%2.03%1.83%2.01%1.13%0.02%2.03%
HMWO.L
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF
1.42%1.60%1.75%1.27%1.55%1.97%2.11%1.91%1.84%1.86%1.72%1.95%

Drawdowns

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGT.L drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than HMWO.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGT.L and HMWO.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.30%
-0.81%
FGT.L
HMWO.L

Volatility

FGT.L vs. HMWO.L - Volatility Comparison

Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF (HMWO.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that FGT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.47%
2.93%
FGT.L
HMWO.L