PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGT.L vs. CTY.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FGT.LCTY.L
YTD Return0.91%7.04%
1Y Return6.76%11.67%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.15%7.12%
5Y Return (Ann)1.21%5.20%
10Y Return (Ann)7.02%5.39%
Sharpe Ratio0.531.01
Sortino Ratio0.851.48
Omega Ratio1.101.19
Calmar Ratio0.531.81
Martin Ratio2.835.08
Ulcer Index2.20%2.16%
Daily Std Dev11.65%10.86%
Max Drawdown-53.70%-67.77%
Current Drawdown-4.80%-5.46%

Fundamentals


FGT.LCTY.L
Market Cap£1.39B£2.09B
EPS£0.04£0.59
PE Ratio214.257.09
Total Revenue (TTM)£96.62M£241.02M
Gross Profit (TTM)£91.89M£234.59M
EBITDA (TTM)-£1.29M£166.57M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FGT.L and CTY.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FGT.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than CTY.L's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FGT.L has outperformed CTY.L with an annualized return of 7.02%, while CTY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.15%
0.48%
FGT.L
CTY.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FGT.L, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.91
CTY.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTY.L, currently valued at 4.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.85

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the CTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGT.L and CTY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
1.03
FGT.L
CTY.L

Dividends

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Dividend Comparison

FGT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than CTY.L's 4.99% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FGT.L
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust
2.32%2.22%2.15%1.86%1.90%1.84%2.03%1.83%2.01%1.13%0.02%2.03%
CTY.L
The City of London Investment Trust plc
4.99%4.92%4.82%4.86%5.13%4.24%4.66%3.86%3.95%1.04%0.04%3.81%

Drawdowns

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGT.L drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum CTY.L drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGT.L and CTY.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.30%
-9.06%
FGT.L
CTY.L

Volatility

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Volatility Comparison

Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that FGT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.47%
4.09%
FGT.L
CTY.L

Financials

FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finsbury Growth & Income Trust and The City of London Investment Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items