FGT.L vs. CTY.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FGT.L or CTY.L.
Key characteristics
FGT.L | CTY.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 0.91% | 7.04% |
1Y Return | 6.76% | 11.67% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -0.15% | 7.12% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 1.21% | 5.20% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 7.02% | 5.39% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.53 | 1.01 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | 1.48 |
Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.19 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.53 | 1.81 |
Martin Ratio | 2.83 | 5.08 |
Ulcer Index | 2.20% | 2.16% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.65% | 10.86% |
Max Drawdown | -53.70% | -67.77% |
Current Drawdown | -4.80% | -5.46% |
Fundamentals
FGT.L | CTY.L | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | £1.39B | £2.09B |
EPS | £0.04 | £0.59 |
PE Ratio | 214.25 | 7.09 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | £96.62M | £241.02M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | £91.89M | £234.59M |
EBITDA (TTM) | -£1.29M | £166.57M |
Correlation
The correlation between FGT.L and CTY.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FGT.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than CTY.L's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FGT.L has outperformed CTY.L with an annualized return of 7.02%, while CTY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) and The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Dividend Comparison
FGT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than CTY.L's 4.99% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust | 2.32% | 2.22% | 2.15% | 1.86% | 1.90% | 1.84% | 2.03% | 1.83% | 2.01% | 1.13% | 0.02% | 2.03% |
The City of London Investment Trust plc | 4.99% | 4.92% | 4.82% | 4.86% | 5.13% | 4.24% | 4.66% | 3.86% | 3.95% | 1.04% | 0.04% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGT.L drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum CTY.L drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGT.L and CTY.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Volatility Comparison
Finsbury Growth & Income Trust (FGT.L) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to The City of London Investment Trust plc (CTY.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that FGT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FGT.L vs. CTY.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finsbury Growth & Income Trust and The City of London Investment Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities