PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FGRTX vs. RYH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FGRTX vs. RYH

Last updated May 15, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RYH).

FGRTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1998. RYH is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Equal Weight Index Health Care. It was launched on Nov 7, 2006.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FGRTX or RYH.

Correlation

The correlation between FGRTX and RYH is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FGRTX vs. RYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

FGRTX

YTD

4.17%

1M

11.61%

6M

1.80%

1Y

13.20%

5Y*

18.07%

10Y*

6.53%

RYH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FGRTX vs. RYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRTX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RYH's 0.40% expense ratio.

FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
RYH
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGRTX vs. RYH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FGRTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGRTX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGRTX is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
RYH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYH is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYH is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYH is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYH is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYH is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYH is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGRTX vs. RYH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

FGRTX vs. RYH - Dividend Comparison

FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while RYH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund		1.00%1.04%1.06%1.34%1.76%2.87%2.01%2.22%1.57%1.48%4.07%5.39%
RYH
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Health Care ETF		0.00%0.00%0.69%0.64%0.50%0.51%0.54%0.53%0.47%0.48%0.49%0.43%

Drawdowns

FGRTX vs. RYH - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

FGRTX vs. RYH - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...