FGRO vs. SCHF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGRO (Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGRO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. FGRO is actively managed, while SCHF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGRO returned 12.69%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for SCHF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGRO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.

Performance

FGRO vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRO achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 15.89% return.

FGRO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 6.72%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 16.08%
• 1Y: 38.91%
• 3Y*: 29.35%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: —

SCHF

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 4.54%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 18.66%
• 1Y: 32.44%
• 3Y*: 20.26%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 10.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRO vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF	17.03%	19.61%	32.29%	49.71%	-37.86%	1.72%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.89%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRO and SCHF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.69

The correlation between FGRO and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGRO vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGRO	SCHF
Technology	47.1%	15.7%
Communication Services	18.4%	2.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	5.7%
Healthcare	7.9%	6.5%
Industrials	5.7%	11.5%
Financial Services	4.8%	20.6%
Basic Materials	1.5%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	4.9%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.7%
Utilities	0.5%	1.7%
Energy	0.2%	5.0%

Return for Risk

FGRO vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 62
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRO vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGRO	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.07	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.85	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	2.84	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	11.03	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGRO vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRO and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGRO	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.07	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.61	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.44	0.00

Drawdowns

FGRO vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRO drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRO and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGRO	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-34.87%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-11.48%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-13.41%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	-29.14%	-15.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	-0.57%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-7.38%	-6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	2.95%	+0.68%

Volatility

FGRO vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) is 4.54%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRO	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	5.49%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	13.34%	+0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.28%	15.72%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.33%	16.38%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	17.18%	+8.20%

FGRO vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGRO vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

FGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	2.95%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGRO and SCHF in my portfolio?

FGRO and SCHF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGRO or SCHF?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FGRO (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRO dropped -44.52% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which ETF is better, FGRO or SCHF?

On 5-year performance, FGRO leads with 12.69% vs 9.91% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FGRO has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGRO or SCHF?

Over the 5-year period, FGRO has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGRO or SCHF?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGRO or SCHF?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 0.13% for FGRO.

What is the main difference between FGRO and SCHF?

FGRO is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGRO and 0.06% for SCHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.