FGLGX vs. PBFDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX).
FGLGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. PBFDX is managed by Payson Funds. It was launched on Nov 25, 1991.
Performance
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund | -4.68% | 28.57% | 27.45% | 24.80% | -7.23% | 26.53% | 10.01% | 32.37% | -8.95% | 16.64% |
PBFDX Payson Total Return Fund | -6.41% | 21.20% | 21.77% | 25.65% | -14.60% | 30.84% | 20.49% | 31.67% | -1.79% | 21.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGLGX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly higher than PBFDX's -6.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGLGX having a 15.16% annualized return and PBFDX not far behind at 14.83%.
FGLGX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
PBFDX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGLGX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFDX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGLGX vs. PBFDX — Risk / Return Rank
FGLGX
PBFDX
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) and Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGLGX | PBFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.08 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.64 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.62 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 6.53 | +2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGLGX | PBFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.08 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.69 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.79 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.53 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGLGX and PBFDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Dividend Comparison
FGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than PBFDX's 2.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund | 10.32% | 9.84% | 7.99% | 5.29% | 6.55% | 9.22% | 5.36% | 7.25% | 12.29% | 4.61% | 1.69% | 5.94% |
PBFDX Payson Total Return Fund | 2.01% | 1.95% | 10.67% | 4.68% | 2.34% | 13.07% | 7.59% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 4.98% | 1.15% | 4.81% |
Drawdowns
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGLGX drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum PBFDX drawdown of -54.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLGX and PBFDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGLGX | PBFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.42% | -54.99% | +18.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -11.92% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.21% | -22.17% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.42% | -33.02% | -3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.43% | -10.93% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -6.75% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.95% | -0.32% |
Volatility
FGLGX vs. PBFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) is 4.44%, while Payson Total Return Fund (PBFDX) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that FGLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGLGX | PBFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 5.24% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 11.58% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 20.70% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 17.66% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 18.94% | -0.59% |