PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FGF vs. KBWP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FGF vs. KBWP

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP).

KBWP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2010.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FGF or KBWP.

Correlation

The correlation between FGF and KBWP is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FGF vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FGF:

39.69%

KBWP:

5.43%

Max Drawdown

FGF:

-1.76%

KBWP:

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

FGF:

0.00%

KBWP:

0.00%

Returns By Period

FGF

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KBWP

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGF vs. KBWP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGF is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGF is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGF is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGF is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGF is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGF is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
KBWP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBWP is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBWP is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBWP is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBWP is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBWP is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBWP is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGF vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundamental Global Inc. (FGF) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

FGF vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

FGF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGF
Fundamental Global Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FGF vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGF drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -0.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGF and KBWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

FGF vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...