PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGEN vs. FAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FGENFAT
YTD Return-63.29%-6.11%
1Y Return-49.74%-9.39%
3Y Return (Ann)-71.05%-15.95%
5Y Return (Ann)-61.59%27.77%
Sharpe Ratio-0.27-0.15
Sortino Ratio0.610.14
Omega Ratio1.081.02
Calmar Ratio-0.43-0.13
Martin Ratio-0.75-0.25
Ulcer Index57.01%30.73%
Daily Std Dev155.01%50.27%
Max Drawdown-99.56%-81.65%
Current Drawdown-99.52%-50.19%

Fundamentals


FGENFAT
Market Cap$32.67M$89.82M
EPS-$1.70-$8.07
Total Revenue (TTM)$133.68M$143.83B
Gross Profit (TTM)$97.34M$46.70B
EBITDA (TTM)-$92.70M-$64.96B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between FGEN and FAT is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FGEN vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FGEN achieves a -63.29% return, which is significantly lower than FAT's -6.11% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-71.96%
-24.70%
FGEN
FAT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGEN vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGEN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGEN, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGEN, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FGEN, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGEN, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FGEN, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.75
FAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAT, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAT, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FAT, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAT, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FAT, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.25

FGEN vs. FAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGEN and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.27
-0.15
FGEN
FAT

Dividends

FGEN vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

FGEN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
FGEN
FibroGen, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAT
FAT Brands Inc.
10.53%9.24%10.92%4.91%0.00%6.37%18.88%

Drawdowns

FGEN vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGEN drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, which is greater than FAT's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGEN and FAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.52%
-50.19%
FGEN
FAT

Volatility

FGEN vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN) has a higher volatility of 21.50% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 7.88%. This indicates that FGEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.50%
7.88%
FGEN
FAT

Financials

FGEN vs. FAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FibroGen, Inc. and FAT Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items