FGDIX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FGDIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 12, 2006. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FGDIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 1.81% | 142.97% | 14.91% | -0.39% | -13.42% | -10.45% | 26.84% | 35.51% | -12.96% | 8.59% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGDIX having a 14.04% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 14.05%.
FGDIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.43%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 84.61%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FGDIX
VOO
FGDIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 0.98 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 1.50 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.53 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 7.29 | +3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 0.98 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.78 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.83 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDIX and VOO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGDIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDIX Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I | 2.06% | 2.10% | 3.58% | 0.97% | 0.36% | 1.59% | 4.40% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.65% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FGDIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.15% | -33.99% | -43.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.85% | -11.98% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -24.52% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.57% | -33.99% | -16.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.43% | -6.29% | -19.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.98% | -3.72% | -36.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 2.52% | +5.43% |
Volatility
FGDIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) has a higher volatility of 15.39% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FGDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDIX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 5.29% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.03% | 9.44% | +25.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.73% | 18.10% | +24.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 16.82% | +15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 17.99% | +15.06% |