PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGDIX vs. BZ=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDIX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than BZ=F's 57.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FGDIX has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 12.17%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.


FGDIX

1D
-2.89%
1M
0.90%
YTD
4.14%
6M
10.40%
1Y
59.54%
3Y*
40.04%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
12.17%

BZ=F

1D
0.84%
1M
-11.45%
YTD
57.40%
6M
53.37%
1Y
48.20%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGDIX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I
4.14%142.97%14.91%-0.39%-13.42%-10.45%26.84%35.51%-12.96%8.59%
BZ=F
Crude Oil Brent
57.40%-18.48%-3.12%-10.32%10.45%50.15%-21.52%22.68%-19.55%17.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDIX and BZ=F is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2005

0.23

The correlation between FGDIX and BZ=F shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGDIX vs. BZ=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDIX
FGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BZ=F
BZ=F Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BZ=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BZ=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BZ=F Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BZ=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BZ=F Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDIXBZ=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

0.89

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.35

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.75

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.14

3.64

+2.50

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDIX and BZ=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDIXBZ=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

0.89

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.16

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.17

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.13

+0.01

Drawdowns

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDIX drawdown since its inception was -77.15%, smaller than the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDIX and BZ=F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDIXBZ=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.15%

-86.77%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-23.63%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-38.97%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-53.96%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-77.60%

+27.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.73%

-34.43%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.81%

-40.98%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.31%

11.34%

-0.03%

Volatility

FGDIX vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class I (FGDIX) is 14.89%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 16.99%. This indicates that FGDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDIXBZ=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.89%

16.99%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.13%

45.63%

-10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.13%

47.56%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.59%

37.42%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.23%

39.20%

-5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGDIX and BZ=F have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BZ=F has higher volatility (16.99%) compared to FGDIX (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDIX dropped -77.15% vs BZ=F's -86.77%.

FGDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGDIX and BZ=F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer