PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.91%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.


FGD

1D
0.53%
1M
5.91%
6M
10.37%
YTD
14.71%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
9.91%
ALL TIME*
6.12%

VOO

1D
0.03%
1M
1.35%
6M
7.28%
YTD
8.98%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
14.93%
ALL TIME*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.15M$6.09M$6.68M
$3.33B$3.89B$5.42B

FGD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
14.71%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.98%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and VOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.74

The correlation between FGD and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
VOO

Financial Services

10.5%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.5%

Industrials

4.8%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
9.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
9.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.7%

Energy

1.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Technology

1.0%
38.6%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Financial Services

FGD
10.5%
VOO
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
4.8%
VOO
4.5%

Industrials

FGD
4.8%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
3.8%
VOO
9.5%

Communication Services

FGD
1.9%
VOO
9.9%

Basic Materials

FGD
1.0%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

FGD
1.0%
VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

FGD
1.0%
VOO
1.8%

Technology

FGD
1.0%
VOO
38.6%

Utilities

FGD
1.0%
VOO
2.2%

Healthcare

FGD

-

VOO
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.96

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

8.43

+0.40

FGD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-33.99%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.90%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-18.69%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-24.52%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-33.99%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.43%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-3.67%

-8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.07%

+0.87%

Volatility

FGD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 2.43%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.22%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

9.84%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

12.64%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

16.91%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

18.01%

-0.09%

FGD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VOO's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.10%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and VOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to FGD (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.93% vs 9.91% for FGD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.10%, compared with 1.08% for VOO.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.03% for VOO.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer