PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGD having a 11.09% return and VOO slightly lower at 10.91%. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.79%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


FGD

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.09%
6M
12.57%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
9.79%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
11.09%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and VOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.75

The correlation between FGD and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
VOO

Financial Services

33.6%
11.6%

Industrials

14.3%
8.3%

Energy

10.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

9.3%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
10.2%

Basic Materials

6.4%
1.8%

Utilities

4.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Technology

1.2%
35.7%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Financial Services

FGD
33.6%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

FGD
14.3%
VOO
8.3%

Energy

FGD
10.0%
VOO
3.5%

Communication Services

FGD
9.3%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
9.2%
VOO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
8.8%
VOO
10.2%

Basic Materials

FGD
6.4%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

FGD
4.9%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

FGD
2.4%
VOO
1.9%

Technology

FGD
1.2%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

FGD

-

VOO
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.16

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

14.73

-2.69

FGD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.39

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.83

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.89

-0.63

Drawdowns

FGD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-33.99%

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.90%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-18.69%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-24.52%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-33.99%

-10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.70%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.57%

-3.69%

-8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.91%

+0.87%

Volatility

FGD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that FGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.84%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

8.90%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

11.80%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

16.81%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

18.01%

+0.22%

FGD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.09%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and VOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGD has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 9.79% for FGD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 9.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.03% for VOO.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer