PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGCKX vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 23.24%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 22.01% annualized return.


FGCKX

1D
-2.32%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
18.93%
6M
11.69%
1Y
39.27%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
23.24%

QQQ

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.16%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
22.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
18.93%18.67%37.30%47.35%-33.82%22.62%67.61%38.50%-4.07%36.89%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
15.95%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FGCKX and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FGCKX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGCKX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGCKX
FGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGCKXQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.71

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

10.01

+2.26

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGCKX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGCKXQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.01%

-82.97%

+31.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-11.96%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-22.77%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.21%

-35.12%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.21%

-35.12%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

-4.66%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-32.72%

+23.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.23%

+0.18%

Volatility

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) is 7.78%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that FGCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGCKXQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

9.17%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.92%

14.54%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

17.95%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.22%

22.69%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.50%

22.41%

+1.09%

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGCKX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
0.00%0.00%8.80%3.81%7.16%10.63%8.83%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.20%3.96%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FGCKX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to FGCKX (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCKX dropped -51.01% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

FGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGCKX and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer