FG vs. URA
FG (F&G Annuities & Life Inc. ) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 3 years, FG returned 13.16%/yr vs 34.68%/yr for URA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FG vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FG achieves a -7.92% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.67% return.
FG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -7.92%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- -10.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 34.68%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
FG vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | -7.92% | -23.60% | -7.98% | 137.11% | -9.05% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.67% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FG and URA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between FG and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FG vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
FG
URA
FG vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.87 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 1.87 | -2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FG vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FG drawdown since its inception was -56.24%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FG and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.24% | -93.54% | +37.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.92% | -31.48% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.24% | -37.81% | -18.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.92% | -48.27% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -74.90% | +55.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.72% | 14.58% | +3.14% |
Volatility
FG vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) is 10.86%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that FG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FG | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 17.86% | -7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.38% | 39.53% | -8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.73% | 51.33% | -14.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 43.92% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 37.95% | +5.97% |
Dividends
FG vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than URA's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | 3.48% | 2.95% | 2.05% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.57% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FG and URA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to FG (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FG dropped -56.24% vs URA's -93.54%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FG and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer