PortfoliosLab logo
FG vs. BLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FG and BLK is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FG vs. BLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FG:

-0.48

BLK:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

FG:

-0.44

BLK:

1.31

Omega Ratio

FG:

0.94

BLK:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

FG:

-0.63

BLK:

0.94

Martin Ratio

FG:

-1.57

BLK:

2.98

Ulcer Index

FG:

15.05%

BLK:

7.52%

Daily Std Dev

FG:

46.93%

BLK:

26.12%

Max Drawdown

FG:

-37.50%

BLK:

-60.36%

Current Drawdown

FG:

-34.29%

BLK:

-9.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FG:

$4.31B

BLK:

$149.22B

EPS

FG:

$3.80

BLK:

$41.13

PE Ratio

FG:

8.42

BLK:

23.42

PS Ratio

FG:

0.84

BLK:

7.12

PB Ratio

FG:

0.99

BLK:

3.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

FG:

$4.15B

BLK:

$21.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FG:

$3.16B

BLK:

$13.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

FG:

$846.00M

BLK:

$8.15B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FG achieves a -23.06% return, which is significantly lower than BLK's -5.53% return.


FG

YTD

-23.06%

1M

-6.90%

6M

-31.97%

1Y

-22.45%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BLK

YTD

-5.53%

1M

5.12%

6M

-6.10%

1Y

26.03%

3Y*

19.01%

5Y*

16.23%

10Y*

13.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


F&G Annuities & Life Inc.

BlackRock, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FG vs. BLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FG is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FG is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FG is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FG is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FG is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLK is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLK is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLK is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLK is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLK is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLK is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FG vs. BLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) and BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FG Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the BLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FG and BLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FG vs. BLK - Dividend Comparison

FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than BLK's 2.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FG
F&G Annuities & Life Inc.
2.71%2.05%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
2.13%1.99%2.46%2.75%1.80%2.01%2.63%3.06%1.95%2.41%2.56%2.16%

Drawdowns

FG vs. BLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FG drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, smaller than the maximum BLK drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FG and BLK.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FG vs. BLK - Volatility Comparison

F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) has a higher volatility of 17.74% compared to BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) at 5.66%. This indicates that FG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FG vs. BLK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F&G Annuities & Life Inc. and BlackRock, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
908.00M
5.28B
(FG) Total Revenue
(BLK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items