PortfoliosLab logo
FFWM vs. BRK-B
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FFWM and BRK-B is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFWM:

-0.10

BRK-B:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

FFWM:

0.15

BRK-B:

1.74

Omega Ratio

FFWM:

1.02

BRK-B:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

FFWM:

-0.13

BRK-B:

2.75

Martin Ratio

FFWM:

-0.45

BRK-B:

6.56

Ulcer Index

FFWM:

24.67%

BRK-B:

3.70%

Daily Std Dev

FFWM:

60.47%

BRK-B:

19.75%

Max Drawdown

FFWM:

-86.54%

BRK-B:

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

FFWM:

-81.21%

BRK-B:

-6.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FFWM:

$444.06M

BRK-B:

$1.10T

EPS

FFWM:

-$1.30

BRK-B:

$37.53

PEG Ratio

FFWM:

2.80

BRK-B:

10.06

PS Ratio

FFWM:

3.91

BRK-B:

2.95

PB Ratio

FFWM:

0.46

BRK-B:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

FFWM:

$387.09M

BRK-B:

$395.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FFWM:

$383.37M

BRK-B:

$317.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

FFWM:

-$125.02M

BRK-B:

$115.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFWM achieves a -15.30% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FFWM has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of -4.88%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.


FFWM

YTD

-15.30%

1M

5.84%

6M

-34.90%

1Y

-5.90%

3Y*

-37.78%

5Y*

-17.76%

10Y*

-4.88%

BRK-B

YTD

11.67%

1M

-5.31%

6M

4.78%

1Y

25.26%

3Y*

16.62%

5Y*

22.22%

10Y*

13.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


First Foundation Inc.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFWM vs. BRK-B — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFWM is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFWM is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFWM is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFWM is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFWM is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFWM is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BRK-B is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BRK-B is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FFWM Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFWM and BRK-B, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither FFWM nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019
FFWM
First Foundation Inc.
0.00%0.32%1.65%3.07%1.45%1.40%1.15%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFWM drawdown since its inception was -86.54%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFWM and BRK-B.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 6.63%. This indicates that FFWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FFWM vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Foundation Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20212022202320242025
146.29M
83.29B
(FFWM) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items