PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTY vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTY vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 7.57%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


FFTY

1D
-0.14%
1M
7.67%
YTD
20.11%
6M
21.02%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
7.57%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTY vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
20.11%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%25.74%-16.76%37.62%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and SPYD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between FFTY and SPYD has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FFTY vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFTY
SPYD

Industrials

26.6%
2.3%

Technology

24.8%
2.7%

Basic Materials

21.6%
3.4%

Financial Services

13.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

12.1%
5.2%

Energy

8.0%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
6.5%

Communication Services

3.7%
5.1%

Utilities

2.1%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.3%

Real Estate

-

25.8%

Industrials

FFTY
26.6%
SPYD
2.3%

Technology

FFTY
24.8%
SPYD
2.7%

Basic Materials

FFTY
21.6%
SPYD
3.4%

Financial Services

FFTY
13.1%
SPYD
12.1%

Healthcare

FFTY
12.1%
SPYD
5.2%

Energy

FFTY
8.0%
SPYD
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FFTY
4.8%
SPYD
6.5%

Communication Services

FFTY
3.7%
SPYD
5.1%

Utilities

FFTY
2.1%
SPYD
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

FFTY

-

SPYD
16.3%

Real Estate

FFTY

-

SPYD
25.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTY vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTY vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFTYSPYDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.42

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.15

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.33

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.36

6.77

-2.41

FFTY vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFTYSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.42

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.42

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.47

-0.27

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTYSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-46.42%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-7.05%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

-16.13%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

-22.25%

-37.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

-46.42%

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

-1.11%

-14.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.38%

-6.17%

-16.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

2.43%

+6.34%

Volatility

FFTY vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTYSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.42%

2.57%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.18%

7.71%

+18.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.09%

11.62%

+22.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.14%

16.13%

+13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

19.78%

+7.63%

FFTY vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTY vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.12%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.00%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTY and SPYD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 7.57% for FFTY. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.12% for FFTY.

FFTY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer