PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTWX vs. FFFHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTWX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than FFFHX's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTWX has underperformed FFFHX with an annualized return of 8.42%, while FFFHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.


FFTWX

1D
0.96%
1M
2.27%
YTD
8.73%
6M
8.85%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
8.42%

FFFHX

1D
1.47%
1M
3.28%
YTD
14.64%
6M
14.69%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTWX
Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund
8.73%16.46%8.20%14.10%-16.66%10.09%14.70%19.45%-5.93%15.57%
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
14.64%23.72%14.11%20.45%-18.29%16.59%18.25%25.33%-8.90%22.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTWX and FFFHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2006

0.98

The correlation between FFTWX and FFFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTWX vs. FFFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTWX
FFTWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFHX
FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTWXFFFHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.28

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

14.30

-1.12

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FFFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTWX and FFFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTWX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, smaller than the maximum FFFHX drawdown of -56.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTWX and FFFHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTWXFFFHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-56.38%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-9.70%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.87%

-15.36%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-27.39%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.66%

-30.91%

+7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-8.81%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.22%

-0.73%

Volatility

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) is 3.66%, while Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that FFTWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTWXFFFHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

5.73%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

11.60%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.60%

13.63%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.04%

15.16%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.13%

15.44%

-5.31%

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTWX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFHX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTWX vs. FFFHX - Dividend Comparison

FFTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than FFFHX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFHX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund
5.22%4.14%1.86%1.78%11.83%11.76%4.93%6.48%7.69%3.98%4.12%4.16%
FFTWX
Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund
6.73%6.44%3.74%2.08%9.66%10.38%5.75%6.09%6.39%3.04%3.91%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FFTWX and FFFHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFHX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to FFTWX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTWX dropped -47.51% vs FFFHX's -56.38%.

FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTWX and FFFHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer