FFSG vs. BRK-A
Compare and contrast key facts about FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF (FFSG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A).
FFSG is an actively managed fund by Al Marketing LLC. It was launched on Oct 31, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FFSG or BRK-A.
Correlation
The correlation between FFSG and BRK-A is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FFSG vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
FFSG
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BRK-A
24.08%
-4.36%
9.08%
23.82%
14.69%
11.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FFSG vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF (FFSG) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FFSG vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison
Neither FFSG nor BRK-A has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF | 0.00% | 1.89% | 0.97% | 1.60% | 1.16% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 0.62% |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFSG vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
FFSG vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF (FFSG) is 0.00%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that FFSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.