PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFSG vs. AOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFSGAOA

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between FFSG and AOA is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FFSG vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
6.30%
FFSG
AOA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFSG vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSG has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.


FFSG
FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for FFSG: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for AOA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFSG vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF (FFSG) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSG
Sharpe ratio
No data
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFSG, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.00
AOA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AOA, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AOA, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AOA, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AOA, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AOA, currently valued at 14.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.62

FFSG vs. AOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.00
2.28
FFSG
AOA

Dividends

FFSG vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

FFSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FFSG
FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF
0.00%1.89%0.97%1.60%1.16%1.52%1.71%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.11%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.02%2.15%2.18%1.84%

Drawdowns

FFSG vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.46%
-1.55%
FFSG
AOA

Volatility

FFSG vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF (FFSG) is 0.00%, while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that FFSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
2.62%
FFSG
AOA