FFSFX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FFSFX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by Fidelity, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. FFSFX is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFSFX returned 10.59%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for VT. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFSFX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FFSFX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSFX achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.06% return.

FFSFX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 14.11%
• 1Y: 31.19%
• 3Y*: 20.77%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.32%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSFX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	14.63%	23.76%	14.01%	20.54%	-18.28%	16.54%	18.08%	9.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	10.06%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSFX and VT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.97

The correlation between FFSFX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFSFX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSFX

FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 59
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSFX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSFX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.91	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.62	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.35	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	2.67	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.42	11.57	+2.84

FFSFX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSFX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSFX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSFX drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSFX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSFX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.03%	-50.27%	+19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-9.67%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	-16.51%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.31%	-26.38%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-2.80%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-7.00%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.23%	0.00%

Volatility

FFSFX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSFX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	5.65%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	11.32%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.77%	13.58%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	16.19%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	17.20%	-0.11%

FFSFX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSFX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FFSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	4.88%	3.69%	2.29%	2.01%	8.77%	7.81%	2.25%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSFX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FFSFX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFSFX or VT?

FFSFX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to VT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSFX dropped -31.03% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.