FFSFX vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FFSFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 2019. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FFSFX or VT.
Key characteristics
| FFSFX | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.23% | 19.63% |
| 1Y Return | 27.44% | 30.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.51% | 5.98% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.44% | 11.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.39 | 2.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.34 | 3.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.34 | 3.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.39 | 18.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.78% | 1.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.47% | 11.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.17% | -50.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.22% | -0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFSFX and VT is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FFSFX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FFSFX achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 19.63% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFSFX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFSFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FFSFX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FFSFX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FFSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VT's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund | 1.08% | 1.25% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 1.02% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.82% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
FFSFX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFSFX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSFX and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FFSFX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.