FFSFX vs. FFFHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund) and FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFSFX returned 10.42%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for FFFHX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFSFX having a 13.84% return and FFFHX slightly lower at 13.62%.

FFSFX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 13.84%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 31.32%
• 3Y*: 20.72%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: —

FFFHX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 15.48%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 20.61%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	13.84%	23.76%	14.01%	20.54%	-18.28%	16.54%	18.08%	9.00%
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	13.62%	23.72%	14.11%	20.45%	-18.29%	16.59%	18.25%	8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSFX and FFFHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.99

The correlation between FFSFX and FFFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFSFX vs. FFFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSFX

FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FFFHX

FFFHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FFFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FFFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FFFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFSFX	FFFHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.48	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.41	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.46	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	3.25	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.44	14.45	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FFFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSFX and FFFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFSFX	FFFHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.48	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.70	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.47	+0.31

Drawdowns

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSFX drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum FFFHX drawdown of -56.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSFX and FFFHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSFX	FFFHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.03%	-56.38%	+25.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-9.70%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	-15.36%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.31%	-27.39%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-8.83%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.18%	+0.01%

Volatility

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSFX	FFFHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	4.25%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	10.46%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.79%	12.71%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	15.00%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	15.38%	+1.66%

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FFSFX and FFFHX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

FFSFX vs. FFFHX - Dividend Comparison

FFSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than FFFHX's 5.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund	5.27%	4.14%	1.86%	1.78%	11.83%	11.76%	4.93%	6.48%	7.69%	3.98%	4.12%	4.16%
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund	4.91%	3.69%	2.29%	2.01%	8.77%	7.81%	2.25%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSFX and FFFHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FFSFX and FFFHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFSFX or FFFHX?

FFSFX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FFFHX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSFX dropped -31.03% vs FFFHX's -56.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.