PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRTX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class M (FFRTX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRTX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's -0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRTX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 4.58%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.96% annualized return.


FFRTX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
4.58%

FTHRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.32%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFRTX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class M
1.36%5.16%6.95%11.37%-1.77%4.73%1.36%8.29%-0.21%3.61%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.14%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRTX and FTHRX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2000

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRTX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRTX
FFRTX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FFRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class M (FFRTX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFRTXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.22

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

1.59

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.81

4.36

+10.45

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRTX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRTX drawdown since its inception was -22.24%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRTX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRTXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.24%

-19.01%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-2.11%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.21%

-2.68%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.01%

-13.18%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.24%

-13.25%

-8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.38%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.03%

-3.06%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.76%

-0.40%

Volatility

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class M (FFRTX) is 0.64%, while Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that FFRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRTXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.88%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

2.08%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32%

2.79%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

4.04%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

3.40%

+0.69%

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRTX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRTX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

FFRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than FTHRX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRTX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class M
6.81%7.12%6.70%7.25%3.57%2.47%3.54%4.84%4.41%3.76%4.04%3.34%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.70%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRTX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHRX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to FFRTX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRTX dropped -22.24% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FFRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRTX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer