PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOPX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFOPX having a 12.47% return and FSKAX slightly lower at 12.08%. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.


FFOPX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.54%
YTD
12.47%
6M
13.34%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
11.95%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
12.47%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%26.00%-7.19%20.61%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOPX and FSKAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.96

The correlation between FFOPX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOPX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFOPXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.38

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.24

15.52

-1.28

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOPX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFOPXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.76

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.85

-0.13

Drawdowns

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOPXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-35.01%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-8.92%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-19.43%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-25.39%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-35.01%

+4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-4.02%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.94%

+0.09%

Volatility

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FFOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOPXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.97%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

9.23%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

12.26%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

17.41%

-3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.46%

-3.30%

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFOPX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.78%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFOPX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFOPX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOPX dropped -30.71% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FFOPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOPX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer