PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFNOX vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFNOX achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 6.35% return.


FFNOX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.58%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.18%

NTSX

1D
-2.87%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
6.35%
6M
5.67%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
11.12%20.18%13.05%19.29%-18.02%17.05%16.30%25.09%-9.94%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
6.35%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FFNOX and NTSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.90

The correlation between FFNOX and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFNOX vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFNOX
FFNOX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFNOXNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.52

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

11.11

+1.85

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFNOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFNOX and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFNOXNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.83

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.54

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.69

-0.25

Drawdowns

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFNOX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFNOX and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNOXNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-31.34%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-9.16%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-16.82%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-31.34%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.12%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-6.79%

-1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.08%

-0.11%

Volatility

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) is 3.46%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that FFNOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFNOXNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.36%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

10.04%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

12.67%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

17.08%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

18.29%

-3.72%

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFNOX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFNOX vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

FFNOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than NTSX's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
2.31%3.68%6.43%3.18%7.14%5.71%2.87%2.96%2.90%0.64%2.50%0.70%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.10%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFNOX and NTSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FFNOX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFNOX dropped -49.84% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

FFNOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFNOX and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer