PortfoliosLab logo
FFLV vs. VDIGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFLV and VDIGX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FFLV vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFLV:

0.18

VDIGX:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

FFLV:

0.49

VDIGX:

-0.41

Omega Ratio

FFLV:

1.07

VDIGX:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

FFLV:

0.27

VDIGX:

-0.30

Martin Ratio

FFLV:

0.86

VDIGX:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

FFLV:

5.31%

VDIGX:

8.88%

Daily Std Dev

FFLV:

17.18%

VDIGX:

17.36%

Max Drawdown

FFLV:

-16.71%

VDIGX:

-46.89%

Current Drawdown

FFLV:

-8.62%

VDIGX:

-16.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's -3.14% return.


FFLV

YTD

-0.85%

1M

2.71%

6M

-6.40%

1Y

3.07%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VDIGX

YTD

-3.14%

1M

1.62%

6M

-14.22%

1Y

-7.57%

5Y*

6.80%

10Y*

6.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLV vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VDIGX's 0.27% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLV vs. VDIGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLV is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLV is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLV is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VDIGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VDIGX is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VDIGX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VDIGX is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VDIGX is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VDIGX is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VDIGX is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFLV vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FFLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the VDIGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLV and VDIGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FFLV vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VDIGX's 1.93% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
1.93%1.87%1.69%1.67%1.46%1.62%1.72%2.15%1.92%1.92%1.93%1.91%

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum VDIGX drawdown of -46.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and VDIGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FFLV vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...