FFLV vs. VDIGX
FFLV (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF) and VDIGX (Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund) are both funds - FFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while VDIGX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFLV returned 27.22% vs 8.31% for VDIGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFLV charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDIGX.
Performance
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.63% return.
FFLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDIGX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 11.22% | 16.04% | 8.04% |
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | 2.63% | 11.11% | 15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLV and VDIGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FFLV and VDIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLV vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank
FFLV
VDIGX
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLV | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 0.95 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | 3.67 | +11.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLV | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.86 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.62 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum VDIGX drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and VDIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLV | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -45.23% | +28.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -9.09% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.10% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -6.65% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.36% | -0.50% |
Volatility
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 2.33%. This indicates that FFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLV | VDIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.33% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 7.61% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 10.06% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 13.86% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 15.70% | -1.48% |
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VDIGX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLV vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison
FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VDIGX's 23.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.60% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund | 23.93% | 21.90% | 21.94% | 2.29% | 6.06% | 5.45% | 2.83% | 4.70% | 8.72% | 5.16% | 2.86% | 5.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFLV and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFLV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VDIGX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLV dropped -16.71% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.
FFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLV and VDIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer