FFLG vs. AMZN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFLG (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FFLG returned 12.59%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for AMZN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FFLG vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLG achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 8.32% return.

FFLG

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 7.34%
• YTD: 16.49%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 28.99%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

AMZN

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -8.10%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 7.59%
• 1Y: 21.54%
• 3Y*: 26.25%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 21.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLG vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	16.49%	19.61%	32.29%	49.71%	-37.86%	1.72%
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	8.32%	5.21%	44.39%	80.88%	-49.62%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLG and AMZN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.74

The correlation between FFLG and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFLG vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLG

FFLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FFLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FFLG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

AMZN

AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 60
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLG vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLG	AMZN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	0.72	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.18	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.15	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	1.00	+1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	2.39	+8.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFLG vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLG and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLG	AMZN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	0.72	+1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.26	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.57	-0.13

Drawdowns

FFLG vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLG drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLG and AMZN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLG	AMZN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.52%	-94.40%	+49.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.23%	-21.74%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-30.88%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.52%	-56.15%	+11.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-9.08%	+8.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-28.12%	+13.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	9.02%	-5.39%

Volatility

FFLG vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is 4.60%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that FFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLG	AMZN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	7.24%	-2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	20.35%	-6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	30.00%	-11.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.34%	35.50%	-10.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	32.46%	-7.08%

Dividends

FFLG vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

FFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFLG Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLG and AMZN in my portfolio?

FFLG and AMZN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFLG or AMZN?

AMZN has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to FFLG (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLG dropped -44.52% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.