FFIZX vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2040 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

FFIZX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.

Performance

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2040 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFIZX Fidelity Freedom Index 2040 Fund Institutional Premium Class	-1.32%	19.93%	13.37%	19.44%	-18.15%	15.97%	16.51%	26.01%	-7.20%	20.57%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-3.95%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIZX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FFIZX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 10.49%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.

FFIZX

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: -1.32%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 14.46%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIZX

FFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2040 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFIZX	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.92	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.41	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	1.41	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	6.61	+1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIZX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFIZX	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	0.92	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.61	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.68	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.46	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between FFIZX and ^GSPC is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIZX and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFIZX	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.69%	-56.78%	+26.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-12.14%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.07%	-25.43%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.69%	-33.92%	+3.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-5.78%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.72%	-10.75%	+6.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.60%	-0.43%

Volatility

FFIZX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2040 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIZX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFIZX	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	5.37%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	9.55%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.93%	18.33%	-4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.76%	16.90%	-3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	18.05%	-3.20%