PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGZX vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGZX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGZX achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGZX has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 4.06%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.33% annualized return.


FFGZX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
6M
2.17%
YTD
3.16%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
4.06%
ALL TIME*
3.90%

TLT

1D
0.33%
1M
-3.49%
6M
-2.86%
YTD
-3.18%
1Y
-2.12%
3Y*
-1.15%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
-2.33%
ALL TIME*
3.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.39B$2.06B$2.20B

FFGZX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.16%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-3.18%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGZX and TLT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.45

The correlation between FFGZX and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGZX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFGZX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGZXTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.97

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

-0.28

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

-0.59

+9.48

FFGZX vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGZX and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGZX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGZX drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGZX and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGZXTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-48.35%

+33.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-7.74%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-14.79%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-43.70%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-48.35%

+33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-42.17%

+41.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-14.00%

+11.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.60%

-2.78%

Volatility

FFGZX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) is 1.34%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that FFGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGZXTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

2.51%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

6.84%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

9.24%

-4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

15.74%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.47%

14.83%

-10.36%

FFGZX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFGZX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

FFGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than TLT's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
2.76%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.75%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGZX and TLT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to FFGZX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGZX dropped -14.94% vs TLT's -48.35%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGZX and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer