PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFGCX vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFGCXFFRHX
YTD Return8.56%7.13%
1Y Return10.27%9.94%
3Y Return (Ann)8.02%6.26%
5Y Return (Ann)12.70%5.56%
10Y Return (Ann)6.23%4.57%
Sharpe Ratio0.503.88
Sortino Ratio0.7912.48
Omega Ratio1.104.00
Calmar Ratio0.3611.78
Martin Ratio1.7062.37
Ulcer Index4.99%0.16%
Daily Std Dev16.88%2.62%
Max Drawdown-55.11%-22.19%
Current Drawdown-9.52%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FFGCX and FFRHX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 6.23%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.27%
4.25%
FFGCX
FFRHX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
Expense ratio chart for FFGCX: current value at 0.94% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.94%
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGCX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFGCX, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFGCX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFGCX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFGCX, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFGCX, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.48
FFRHX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 3.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 12.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0012.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 4.00, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.004.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 11.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0011.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 62.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0062.37

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGCX and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
0.74
3.88
FFGCX
FFRHX

Dividends

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FFRHX's 8.45% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
1.86%2.01%1.84%3.39%1.61%2.98%2.06%0.99%0.93%2.86%3.07%2.75%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.45%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%3.46%

Drawdowns

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-9.52%
0
FFGCX
FFRHX

Volatility

FFGCX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.82%. This indicates that FFGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
4.24%
0.82%
FFGCX
FFRHX